Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (23)



 


 



Institutional Shareholders and Corporate Governance


James Spigelman


affiliation not provided to SSRN

February 25, 2010

Company and Securities Law Journal, Vol. 28, p. 235, 2010

Abstract:     
This article explores the source and nature of the legal obligation, if any, of institutional shareholders to participate in corporate governance by exercising the voting rights attached to shares. While trustee shareholders must use their voting power in the interests of beneficiaries, this does not determine whether a vote should to be cast. Australian fiduciary law – which is proscriptive rather than prescriptive – is unlikely to impose such a duty to vote. Moreover, it seems unlikely that such a duty could be found within the language of s52 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth). Instead, the motivation for voting must be the collective interest of all institutional investors in promoting high standards of corporate governance. In this respect, this article revives a worthy but overlooked proposal for institutional shareholders to establish a list of professional, independent directors.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 5, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Spigelman, James J., Institutional Shareholders and Corporate Governance (February 25, 2010). Company and Securities Law Journal, Vol. 28, p. 235, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1797424

Contact Information

James J. Spigelman (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 294
Downloads: 62
Download Rank: 180,923
Footnotes:  23

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.500 seconds