The Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases, A National Crisis
William & Mary Law School
Mary Sue Backus
University of Oklahoma College of Law
Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 6, p. 1031, 2005-2006
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-92
Poor people account for more than 80% of individuals prosecuted. These criminal defendants plead guilty approximately 90% of the time. In those cases, many lawyers entered pleas for their clients without spending any significant time on the cases, without interviewing witnesses or filing motions, and with hardly a word to their clients. But the first rule of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct indicates that “competent representation” requires “the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.” This article chronicles the Supreme Court’s doctrine regarding the constitutional right to counsel of indigent defendants. The article also describes recent research conducted by the National Committee on the Right to Counsel, which reveals common problems facing state and local governments in meeting their constitutional obligations. Finally, this article offers recommendations that governments should implement to protect the right to counsel and suggests ways in which groups or individuals may generate these reforms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 101
Keywords: prosecute, criminal, defendant, plea, counsel, reform, indigent, and representationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 29, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.500 seconds