Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1797926
 


 



On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility


Robert D. Sloane


Boston University - School of Law

March 28, 2011

106 American Journal of International Law 447 (2012)
Boston Univ. School of Law Paper No. 11-16

Abstract:     
Article 25 of the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility defines necessity as a general “circumstance precluding wrongfulness” in the law of state responsibility. It has been adopted rapidly and almost uniformly, but with scant independent analysis, as a putative codification of international custom. This essay argues that with reference to the ILC mandate, the definition reflects far more “progressive development” than “codification” of general international law. It also questions the definition’s advisability, coherence, and normative appeal in theory and practice.

Keywords: Necessity, Articles on Responsibility of State of Internationally Wrongful Acts, State Responsibility, Investor-State Arbitration, Law of Nations, Choice of Evils, International Law Commission (ILC), International Tribunals, Intermnational Arbitration

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K33

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 30, 2011 ; Last revised: October 15, 2012

Suggested Citation

Sloane, Robert D., On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility (March 28, 2011). 106 American Journal of International Law 447 (2012); Boston Univ. School of Law Paper No. 11-16. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1797926

Contact Information

Robert D. Sloane (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
980B
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,601

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.219 seconds