Comparing the FHCDA to Surrogate Decision Making Laws in Other States

Thaddeus Mason Pope

Mitchell Hamline School of Law; Australian Health Law Research Center, QUT; Saint Georges University; Alden March Bioethics Institute

March 28, 2011

NYSBA Health Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2011
Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-17

This is my invited contribution to a special symposium issue of the New York State Bar Association’s Health Law Journal titled “Implementing the Family Health Care Decisions Act.” While this issue will be of keen interest to medical and legal practitioners in New York, it also holds significant value for those in other states looking to either amend or better implement their own healthcare decisions statutes.

There seem to be at least three distinct missions of this special issue of the Health Law Journal. First, several articles have an empirical focus. They describe how the FHCDA has been implemented in hospitals and nursing homes. Second, several articles have a normative focus. They describe how the FHCDA can and should be extended to health care settings (e.g. hospice, home care) to which it does not now apply. Third, several articles take a broader normative focus. They explain how the FHCDA might be better implemented (e.g. by training ethics committees).

This article serves the third mission. It focuses on those provisions at the heart of the FHCDA: the authorization of surrogates to make health care decisions on the patient’s behalf. Specifically, this Article compares the surrogate rules in the FHCDA to the “default” surrogate rules in other states’ health care decisions statutes. These comparisons can be usefully grouped into three categories: (1) the surrogate list, (2) the scope of surrogate decision making authority, and (3) the resolution of conflicts between and among surrogates.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: health law, healthcare, health care decisions, surrogates

JEL Classification: K32

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 30, 2011 ; Last revised: November 6, 2013

Suggested Citation

Pope, Thaddeus Mason, Comparing the FHCDA to Surrogate Decision Making Laws in Other States (March 28, 2011). NYSBA Health Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2011; Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1797930

Contact Information

Thaddeus Mason Pope (Contact Author)
Mitchell Hamline School of Law ( email )
875 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105
United States
651-695-7661 (Phone)
901-202-7549 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.thaddeuspope.com
Australian Health Law Research Center, QUT ( email )
2 George Street
Brisbane, Queensland 4000
Saint Georges University ( email )
West Indies
HOME PAGE: http://www.thaddeuspope.com
Alden March Bioethics Institute ( email )
47 New Scotland Ave
MC 153
Albany, NY 12208
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.thaddeuspope.com
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 817
Downloads: 146
Download Rank: 139,813

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.516 seconds