The Sharpest Tool in the Shed: An Examination of Financial Statement Management Tools during IPOs
McGill University - Desautels Faculty of Management
University of San Francisco
Mark T. Soliman
University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business
September 5, 2013
The current literature presents conflicting evidence as to whether IPO firms manage earnings. Two major shortcomings of prior studies are their assumptions that: 1) investors primarily care about bottom-line earnings; and 2) all firms, regardless of their operating models, only manage earnings. We relax those assumptions by examining the application of discretion over various accounting items across different industry sectors. We find cross-sectional variation in the application of discretion over sales, R&D (R&D overinvestment), and other earnings items, with discretion being significantly associated with the relative importance of the items for IPO valuation. We further show that sales growth possesses the greatest value relevance, and the majority of IPO firms correspondingly manage sales. Lastly, we show that managed sales, and to a lesser degree managed other earnings items, are negatively associated with future stock returns. Overall, we provide robust evidence of use of discretion by IPO firms over various accounting items, depending on the firm’s operating model.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49
Keywords: Initial public offering; discretion over accounting items; IPO valuation; earnings management.
Date posted: March 30, 2011 ; Last revised: September 11, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds