Human Dignity in Constitutional Adjudication
Notre Dame Law School
March 30, 2011
RESEARCH HANDBOOK IN COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon, eds., Edward Elgar, 2011
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 11-17
This chapter, for a forthcoming research handbook of comparative constitutional law, provides a broad overview of comparative case law and scholarship regarding the use of the idea of human dignity in constitutional adjudication. The chapter notes both the core common meanings accorded to the status and the principle of dignity, and also the high degree of variation and indeterminacy that they have in a variety of contentious contexts. The chapter then proposes a loose taxonomy of (a) different categories of constitutional issues in which human dignity is invoked, and (b) different functional purposes that the judicial invocation and discussion of human dignity typically serves. The overall aim is to help provide a framework for ongoing research and analysis of human dignity across a variety of different constitutional and international jurisdictions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15
Keywords: human dignity, human rights adjudication, comparative constitutional law ; international human rightsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 1, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.438 seconds