Political Hot Potato: How Closing Loopholes Can Get Policymakers Cooked
Stephanie Hunter McMahon
University of Cincinnati - College of Law
March 31, 2011
Journal of Legislation, 2011
Loopholes in the law are weaknesses that allow the law to be circumvented. Once created, they prove hard to eliminate. A case study of the evolving tax unit used in the federal income tax explores policymakers’ response to loopholes. The 1913 income tax created an opportunity for wealthy married couples to shift ownership of family income between spouses, then to file separately, and, as a result, to reduce their collective taxes. In 1948, Congress reluctantly closed this loophole by extending the income-splitting benefit to all married taxpayers filing jointly. Congress acted only after the federal judiciary and Treasury Department pleaded for congressional reform and, receiving none, reduced their roles policing wealthy couples’ tax abuse. The other branches would no longer accept the delegated power to regulate the tax unit. By examining these developments, this article explores the impact of the separation of powers on the closing of loopholes and adds to the understanding of how the government operates. It concludes that when policies produce loopholes that are not politically salient, the system may operate for the greater good for a time, but there is a limit to how long policymakers will accept a delegation of responsibility.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: income tax, joint return, public choice, positive political theory
Date posted: April 6, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds