|
||||
|
||||
What Drives Sell-Side Analyst Compensation at High-Status Investment Banks?Boris GroysbergHarvard Business School Paul M. HealyHarvard Business School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) David A. MaberUniversity of Michigan - Ross School of Business March 29, 2011 Journal of Accounting Research, Forthcoming Abstract: We use proprietary data from a major investment bank to investigate factors associated with analysts’ annual compensation. We find compensation to be positively related to "All-Star" recognition, investment-banking contributions, the size of analysts’ portfolios, and whether an analyst is identified as a top stock-picker by the Wall Street Journal. We find no evidence that compensation is related to earnings forecast accuracy. But consistent with prior studies, we find analyst turnover to be related to forecast accuracy, suggesting that analyst forecasting incentives are primarily termination-based. Additional analyses indicate that "All-Star" recognition proxies for buy-side client votes on analyst research quality used to allocate commissions across banks and analysts. Taken as a whole, our evidence is consistent with analyst compensation being designed to reward actions that increase brokerage and investment-banking revenues. To assess the generality of our findings, we test the same relations using compensation data from a second high-status bank and obtain similar results.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 3, 2011 ; Last revised: May 14, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.469 seconds