Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1800484
 


 



Counterfactual Constitutionalism: The American Civil War and the Framing of Australia’s Constitution


Helen Irving


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

April 1, 2011

Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/26

Abstract:     
Counterfactual history - the construction of imagined, fact-like scenarios arising from the alteration of antecedents and consequents in real past events - is a controversial business. Among supporters, counterfactualism is defended as serving a valuable heuristic function, and furnishing questions to drive research. But can the knowledge generated by counterfactual history have a real-world, functional application? Is it possible to use what we learn from counterfactualism, not just for future research, but to pre-empt or alter the future? Constitution-making provides us with one answer. This proposition is illustrated with a discussion of the use made of the American Civil War by the framers of Australia’s Constitution in the 1890s.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: constitutional history, comparative constitutionalism, counterfactual history, history and law

JEL Classification: K10, K30

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 4, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Irving, Helen, Counterfactual Constitutionalism: The American Civil War and the Framing of Australia’s Constitution (April 1, 2011). Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1800484

Contact Information

Helen Irving (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 532
Downloads: 88
Download Rank: 169,212

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.234 seconds