Is Oklahoma Still Indian Country? 'Justifiable Expectations' and Reservation Disestablishment in Murphy v. Sirmons and Osage Nation v. Irby
Philip H. Tinker
University of Tulsa College of Law
April 1, 2011
Dartmouth Law Journal, Fall 2011
Oklahoma Sovereignty Symposium, Summer 2010
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma recently held that Allotment-Era statutes disestablished Indian tribal reservations in the former Indian Territory. However, these decisions were not based on any express statutory provisions. Rather, the courts focused on the state's history of exercising jurisdiction over the allotted reservations as conclusive evidence that Congress must have intended this result.
This paper argues that these courts relied on the "justifiable expectations" approach adopted by the Supreme Court in the unrelated case of City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation in order to validate the state's longstanding but erroneous assumption that Congress authorized the state to assume jurisdiction over the allotted Indian reservations. In so doing, these courts have revitalized the heretofore repudiated assumption that "Oklahoma is different" and not subject to the limitations on state action in the Indian Country.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 59
Keywords: Indian Country, Reservation Disestablishment, Osage Nation, Muscogee (Creek) Nation, Oklahoma, Indian Territoryworking papers series
Date posted: April 2, 2011 ; Last revised: April 23, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds