Alexy on Necessity in Law and Morals
European University Institute; Rutgers University School of Law, Camden; Swansea University School of Law
February 27, 2012
Ratio Juris, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 47–58, March 2012
Robert Alexy has built his original theory of law upon pervasive claims for “necessary” features of law. In this article, I show that Alexy’s claims suffer from two difficulties. First, Alexy is never clear about what he means by “necessity.” Second, Alexy writes as if there have been no challenges to claims of conceptual necessity. There have been such challenges and Alexy needs to answer them if his project is to succeed.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 2, 2011 ; Last revised: February 28, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds