|
||||
|
||||
Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?David AbramsUniversity of Pennsylvania Law School Marianne BertrandUniversity of Chicago - Booth School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Sendhil MullainathanHarvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) September 30, 2010 Journal of Legal Studies, Forthcoming U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 11-07 Abstract: Are minorities treated differently by the legal system? Systematic racial differences in case characteristics, many unobservable, make this a difficult question to answer directly. In this paper, we estimate whether judges differ from each other in how they sentence minorities, avoiding potential bias from unobservable case characteristics by exploiting the random assignment of cases to judges. We measure the between-judge variation in the difference in incarceration rates and sentence lengths between African-American and White defendants. We perform a Monte Carlo simulation in order to explicitly construct the appropriate counterfactual, where race does not influence judicial sentencing. In our data set, which includes felony cases from Cook County, Illinois, we find statistically significant between-judge variation in incarceration rates, although not in sentence lengths.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52 Keywords: Criminal law, racial discrimination, race and justice, punishment, sentencing, bias, incarceration rate, sentence length, Monte Carlo simulation, empirical research, forecasting and simulation, accounting for disparities in judicial behavior, law and economics of crime JEL Classification: C79, J29, J71, K14 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 2, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.437 seconds