Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1802518
 


 



Competition and Regulation in the Insurance Sector: Reassessing the McCarran-Ferguson Act


Susan Beth Farmer


Penn State Law


Oregon Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 101, 2011
The Pennsylvania State University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 8-2011

Abstract:     
This article was presented at a symposium entitled “Public and Private: Are the Boundaries in Transition?” sponsored by the American Antitrust Institute on June 24, 2010. It proposes a different paradigm, which more precisely describes regulation and competition in the insurance sector. This relationship is the shifting boundary between state and federal regulation instead of a boundary between the public and private sectors. The McCarran-Ferguson Act was adopted to protect firms acting in the business of insurance from federal antitrust scrutiny, but its language and impact goes far beyond federal competition law. So broad is the exemption that the modern effect of the Act only incidentally concerns antitrust. Fundamentally, the Act reifies the boundaries between federal and state power; it is, at base, an allocation of power and an affirmation of the federalism paradigm. In this sector, the distinction is between different manifestations of public power rather than the distinction between public and private power. Moreover, the defense of the antitrust boundaries is a skirmish, not the subject of the main purpose of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which is, as ever, federalism. My provisional conclusions are as follows: the antitrust exemption is unnecessary, but even if it were eliminated, it would have protected little. Reverse preemption, which could be viewed as mere mischief, an unintended consequence, is, in fact, at the heart of this model and exposes the points of the Act: preservation of the boundaries, allocation of power, and deference among the states and federal government.

This Article discusses, first, the antitrust immunity aspect of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, including the asserted justification for the exemption and whether it is required in the era of modern antitrust interpretation. Next, it discusses proposed legislative repealers and reasons for their failure, and offers comparative examples of competition and exemption in the insurance sector from the European Union. Finally, it concludes by returning to first principles, which reach more broadly than antitrust and implicate the structure of federal and state authority.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 7, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Farmer, Susan Beth, Competition and Regulation in the Insurance Sector: Reassessing the McCarran-Ferguson Act. Oregon Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 101, 2011; The Pennsylvania State University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 8-2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1802518

Contact Information

Susan Beth Farmer (Contact Author)
Penn State Law ( email )
309 Beam Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 560
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 155,663

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.282 seconds