Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=180252
 


 



End-of-life Decision Making, Therapeutic Jurisprudence, and Preventive Law: Hierarchical v. Consensus-Based Decision-Making Model


Thomas L. Hafemeister


Independent


Arizona Law Review, Vol. 41, Pp. 329-373, 1999

Abstract:     
In addressing how end-of-life decisions should be made, courts have mandated the use of a hierarchical model in which one person is provided sole decision-making authority. However, this exclusionary approach fails to consider the well-being of a range of individuals deeply affected by these decisions. In contrast, a consensus-based model has been widely endorsed and applied by health care providers. The integrated principles of Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Preventive Law and data from an empirical study of laypersons provide further support for a consensus-based model.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: October 5, 1999  

Suggested Citation

Hafemeister, Thomas L., End-of-life Decision Making, Therapeutic Jurisprudence, and Preventive Law: Hierarchical v. Consensus-Based Decision-Making Model. Arizona Law Review, Vol. 41, Pp. 329-373, 1999. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=180252

Contact Information

Thomas L. Hafemeister (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 403

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds