Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1803235
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The Role of Good Faith in Delaware: How Open-Ended Standards Help Delaware Preserve Its Edge


Renee M. Jones


Boston College - Law School

January 1, 2011

New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2010/11
Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 224

Abstract:     
This Article traces the development of the good faith doctrine in Delaware and links shifts in the doctrine to events occurring in the national economy and in Washington. It shows that in 2003 Delaware judges seemed open to the possibility of imposing liability on directors in a case (Disney) where facts suggested that the directors were overly passive in approving the terms of an employment contract for a senior corporate executive. After the 2001-2002 corporate governance scandals faded, however, the courts abandoned this course. A trio of decisions in Disney, Stone v. Ritter, and Lyondell reiterated what had long been clear prior to 2003, that directors will not face personal liability for the breach of the duty of care. Instead, such liability is limited to situations where directors’ actions or omissions evidence intent to harm the corporation.

The Article also assesses Delaware’s response to the 2008 financial crisis. Thus far, Delaware courts have avoided staking out territory with respect to financial oversight. However, on central governance issues such as shareholder voting the legislature and courts are making an effort to preserve state primacy. The legislature, led by Delaware’s bar, moved quickly in 2009 to try to blunt progress on federal proxy access. In spring 2009 the legislature amended Delaware’s corporate statute to affirm shareholders’ rights to gain access to a corporation’s proxy machinery through binding bylaw amendment. In addition, the Delaware Bar Association formally opposed the Securities and Exchange Commission’s more comprehensive proxy access proposal.

In contrast, the judiciary’s renewed commitment to shield corporate directors from personal liability tied the courts’ hands in ways that made it difficult to respond doctrinally to the financial crisis. Thus, in Citigroup the court declined to break new ground on directors’ obligations to monitor corporate risk, but on the core issue of executive compensation the court reopened a path for recovery that had seemed until then to be firmly shut. The survival of the plaintiffs’ waste claim in Citigroup seems part of Delaware courts’ efforts appear engaged on compensation issues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 6, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Jones, Renee M., The Role of Good Faith in Delaware: How Open-Ended Standards Help Delaware Preserve Its Edge (January 1, 2011). New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2010/11; Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 224. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1803235

Contact Information

Renee M. Jones (Contact Author)
Boston College - Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States
617-552-6374 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 879
Downloads: 148
Download Rank: 117,677
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.296 seconds