Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1804641
 
 

References (68)



 


 



Natural Law 'Externalism' v. Law as 'Moral Aspiration'


Patrick S. O'Donnell



April 7, 2011


Abstract:     
In a recent paper discussing the novel contributions of Hegel to the philosophy of natural law, the moral and political philosopher Thom Brooks draws an "externalist/internalist" distinction for natural law theory. It is argued that Hegel gives us perhaps the first account of "natural law internalism," in contrast to the natural law tradition generally, which is best described as "externalist," meaning our metaphysical and moral assessment of the law invoke normative criteria and standards extrinsic to the law. In this essay I argue that this characterization or picture of the nature of law and its relation to our normative standards is misleading if not entirely mistaken. Rather, there are robust genetic family ties between our normative standards of law and justice or the Good such that it would be more accurate to speak of these criteria as intrinsic to the law qua law, as implicating the very marrow of the purposes and meaning we accord to law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: natural law, law, Plato, Kant, Hegel, natural law internalism, natural law externalism, utopian constructions, moral principles

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 10, 2011 ; Last revised: April 21, 2011

Suggested Citation

O'Donnell, Patrick S., Natural Law 'Externalism' v. Law as 'Moral Aspiration' (April 7, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1804641 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1804641

Contact Information

No contact information is available for Patrick S. O'Donnell
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 507
Downloads: 49
References:  68

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.500 seconds