|
||||
|
||||
Predicting Credit Losses: Loan Fair Values Versus Historical CostsBrett Wooten CantrellUniversity of Texas at Austin John M. McInnisUniversity of Texas at Austin - Department of Accounting Christopher G. YustUniversity of Texas at Austin - McCombs School of Business February 20, 2013 Abstract: Standard setters and many investor groups argue that loan fair values provide more useful information about credit losses than historical cost information while bankers and others generally disagree. We examine the ability of loan fair values to predict credit losses relative to the ability of net historical costs currently recognized under U.S. GAAP. Our analysis is important because credit losses in the banking sector can have severe and widespread economic effects, as the recent financial crisis demonstrates. Overall, we find that net historical loan costs are a better predictor of credit losses than loan fair values. Specifically, we find that historical cost information is more useful in predicting future net chargeoffs, non-performing loans, and bank failures over both short and long time horizons. Further tests indicate that the relative predictive ability of loan fair values improves in higher scrutiny environments, suggesting that a lack of scrutiny over loan fair values may contribute to our findings.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55 Keywords: fair value, loans, historical cost, chargeoffs, impairments, credit loss, bank failure JEL Classification: M41, M44, M45 working papers seriesDate posted: April 12, 2011 ; Last revised: February 23, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.563 seconds