Chosen Discrimination

Robert Leckey

McGill University - Faculty of Law

December 11, 2002

Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 18, pp. 445-75, 2002

The paper studies the analogous grounds under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that most raise the concern that the complainant in equality litigation has made a choice, namely citizenship and marital status. The citizenship example comes from Lavoie v. Canada, a 2002 judgment concerning citizenship preferences in federal public employment. The paper argues that a focus on autonomy and zones of privacy – a sense of matters with which government has no business interfering – works better than the unhelpful dichotomy of things chosen and unchosen.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: discrimination, equality, choice, citizenship, marital status, Canadian Charter, Lavoie

JEL Classification: K19, K10

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 11, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Leckey, Robert, Chosen Discrimination (December 11, 2002). Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 18, pp. 445-75, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1807289

Contact Information

Robert Leckey (Contact Author)
McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )
3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
514-398-4148 (Phone)
514-398-4659 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 463
Downloads: 49

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds