Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1808221
 


 



The Morality of Jingle Mail: Moral Myths about Strategic Default


Curtis Bridgeman


Willamette University College of Law

April 12, 2011

Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 46, 2011
FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 502

Abstract:     
The recent bursting of the housing bubble led to a wave of defaults on home mortgages. Many, no doubt most, of the defaults are due to an inability to pay. But an increasing number of homeowners are engaging in “strategic default,” that is, they are deciding not to pay their mortgage even though they could afford to pay. In the industry the term “jingle mail” suggests an image of borrowers who mail the keys to the bank and walk away from the house and the mortgage. The moral acceptability of strategic default has been the subject of much discussion in the popular press, the blogosphere, and even in academic circles. In this article I address several arguments that strategic default is morally acceptable, and show why these arguments are lacking.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: strategic default, contracts, mortgages


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 13, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Bridgeman, Curtis, The Morality of Jingle Mail: Moral Myths about Strategic Default (April 12, 2011). Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 46, 2011; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 502. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1808221 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808221

Contact Information

Curtis Bridgeman (Contact Author)
Willamette University College of Law ( email )
Salem, OR 97301
United States
503-370-6402 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,908
Downloads: 331
Download Rank: 61,778

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.328 seconds