|
||||
|
||||
Snyder v. Phelps: A Slice of the Facts and Half an OpinionDeana Pollard-SacksTexas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law; Florida State University April 12, 2011 Cardozo Law Review De Novo, p. 64, 2011 Abstract: In Snyder v. Phelps, the Supreme Court reviewed only the picketing aspect of the case, and found that the First Amendment precluded tort liability. The Court declined to consider whether tort liability for the online "epic" that targeted the Snyders personally was constitutional. Snyder v. Phelps is a very narrow opinion and adds little to the debate about whether tort liability for invasion of privacy or intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from speech is constitutional.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 3 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 14, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds