Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1809141
 


 



The Assault on Section 11 of the Securities Act: A Study in Judicial Activism


Marc I. Steinberg


Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

Brent A. Kirby


affiliation not provided to SSRN

April 13, 2011

Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2010
SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 79

Abstract:     
This article focuses on the federal courts' restrictive interpretation of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, the most investor-friendly express remedy that the "New Deal" Congress enacted. This judicial erosion has resulted in a cause of action that extends to fewer investors and is riddled with uncertainty at the pleading stage. The authors posit that recent federal court decisions that have added reliance as an element of Section 11 claims and rejected the use of statistical evidence to prove tracing are inconsistent with Section 11's text and legislative history. The article then explores the inconsistencies associated with pleading Section 11 claims that "sound in fraud" by asserting that these claims should be extended the longer statute of limitations available to such fraud-based claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The authors conclude that the federal courts' focus on impeding vexatious litigation has resulted in unduly restrictive judicial interpretations that have altered the very nature of Section 11.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 67

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 17, 2011 ; Last revised: March 20, 2012

Suggested Citation

Steinberg, Marc I. and Kirby, Brent A., The Assault on Section 11 of the Securities Act: A Study in Judicial Activism (April 13, 2011). Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2010; SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 79. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1809141

Contact Information

Marc I. Steinberg (Contact Author)
Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States
Brent A. Kirby
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 867
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 164,279

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds