Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1809799
 


 



Mede-Eigendom en Onverdeeldheid (Joint and Undivided Ownership)


Alain Laurent P. G. Verbeke


University of Leuven, Director Rector Roger Dillemans Family Property Law Institute, Codirector Institute for Contract Law, Codirector Leuven Center for Notary Law; Harvard Law School; University of Leuven, Faculty of Psychology; Antwerp Management School; Tilburg Law School Department of Private Law and TISCO; Catholic University of Portugal (UCP) - Católica Global School of Law; Greenille Attorneys

Steven Snaet


Independent

February 14, 2011

THEMIS GOEDERENRECHT, pp. 47-70, V. Sagaert & A.-L. Verbeke, eds., Die Keure, 2011

Abstract:     
In this article we discuss recent developments and issues in Belgian property law regarding joint and undivided ownership. We comment on the different sorts of undivided ownership with a focus on coincidental and conventional joint property.

As to the fist, we discuss the rights and obligations of co-owners on their undivided part. Here we comment on recent judgments of the Cour de Cassation such as the 2006 decision on the power to dispose of the undivided part in a single asset and in a totality of assets. Then we discuss the powers as to the undivided property itself, including rights of use and of disposal.

We then analyze several aspects of conventional undivided property, such as the clause of accrual and tontine.

An important focus of the article is on the methods to stop the situation of undivision, in particular the question who can claim the end of undivision and when. There is an important discussion whether the principle of article 815 Belgian CC - allowing each co-owner and each third party the claim to stop the undivision - does apply to conventional undivision. The traditional view is that it does not and that art. 815 is limited to coincidental undivided ownership. The modern view, based on arguments of creditor protection, says it does also apply to conventional joint property.

We argue that a distinction must be made between internal and external effect of joint property. We hold the view that parties may conventionally "close" the undivision because of a special destination of the undivision (such as marriage or an intimate relationship) thus forbidding the co-owners to claim division as long as the special destination continues. However, we claim that parties may only arrange this in their internal relationship but cannot hold this against third parties and creditors who always can claim the division according to art. 815 CC. The only exception (besides the conventional agreement of article 815, section 2) is an explicit legal rule prohibiting the creditors to claim such division. This is e.g. the case for civil partnerships and also in the community property in marital regimes of community property based on articles 1409-1426 CC.

The article concludes with some comments on the retroactive effect of the division and the annulment of division with reference to the important Cour de Cassation decision of 28 Jan. 2010.

Note: Downloadable document is in Dutch.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: Property Law, Undivision, Joint Property, Clause of accrual, Internal and external effect, Retroactivity, Annulment

JEL Classification: K11, K12

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 18, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Verbeke, Alain Laurent P. G. and Snaet, Steven, Mede-Eigendom en Onverdeeldheid (Joint and Undivided Ownership) (February 14, 2011). THEMIS GOEDERENRECHT, pp. 47-70, V. Sagaert & A.-L. Verbeke, eds., Die Keure, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1809799

Contact Information

Alain Laurent P. G. Verbeke (Contact Author)
University of Leuven, Director Rector Roger Dillemans Family Property Law Institute, Codirector Institute for Contract Law, Codirector Leuven Center for Notary Law ( email )
Tiensestraat 41
Leuven, 3000
Belgium
003216325203 (Phone)
003216325296 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.kuleuven.be/fvr
Harvard Law School ( email )
Cambridge, MA
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.pon.harvard.edu/
University of Leuven, Faculty of Psychology
Van Evenstraat 2B
B-3000 Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000
Belgium
HOME PAGE: http://ppw.kuleuven.be/english/wopp/leuven-center-for-collaborative-management
Antwerp Management School ( email )
Het Brantijser
Sint-Jacobsmarkt 9-13
Antwerp, 2000
Belgium
Tilburg Law School Department of Private Law and TISCO ( email )
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands
HOME PAGE: http://www.tilburguniversity.edu/research/institutes-and-research-groups/tisco/
Catholic University of Portugal (UCP) - Católica Global School of Law
Lisboa
Portugal
HOME PAGE: http://www.fd.lisboa.ucp.pt/site/custom/template/ucptplfac.asp?sspageID=3293&lang=2
Greenille Attorneys ( email )
Boulevard de la Woluwe 2
1150 Brussels
Belgium
003227380650 (Phone)
003227380660 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.greenille.eu
Steven Snaet
Independent ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 296
Downloads: 34

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.313 seconds