Abstract

 
 

References (1)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Socially Responsible Firms and Endogenous Choice of Strategic Incentives


Michael Kopel


University of Graz

Björn Brand


University of Graz

April 14, 2011

Economic Modelling, Vol. 29, pp. 982-989, 2012

Abstract:     
In this paper we are analyzing a mixed quantity-setting duopoly consisting of a socially concerned firm and a profit maximizing firm. The socially concerned firm considers one group of stakeholders in its objective function and maximizes its profit plus a share of consumer surplus. Both firms have the option to hire a manager who determines the production quantity on behalf of the firm’s owner. We find that in the subgame-perfect equilibrium of this game both firms hire a manager and delegate the production choice. If the unit production costs of the firms are similar, then the socially concerned firm has a higher market share and even higher profit. Interestingly, we observe that as the share of consumer surplus taken into account by the socially concerned firm increases, also its profit might increase. The conclusion is that it pays off to take stakeholder interests into account, but not too much.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: Socially concerned firms, Corporate social responsibility, Strategic incentives, Mixed oligopoly

JEL Classification: D21, L13, L22, M14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 16, 2011 ; Last revised: April 2, 2012

Suggested Citation

Kopel, Michael and Brand, Björn, Socially Responsible Firms and Endogenous Choice of Strategic Incentives (April 14, 2011). Economic Modelling, Vol. 29, pp. 982-989, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1809816 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1809816

Contact Information

Michael Kopel (Contact Author)
University of Graz ( email )
Universitaetsstrasse 15 / FE
A-8010 Graz, 8010
Austria
Björn Brand
University of Graz ( email )
Universitaetsstrasse 15 / FE
A-8010 Graz, 8010
Austria
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 359
Downloads: 85
Download Rank: 133,453
References:  1
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds