Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1810833
 
 

References (51)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Who Stands at the Top and Bottom of the Slippery Slope?


Tim Brown


University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Accountancy

Kristina M. Rennekamp


Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management

Nicholas Seybert


University of Maryland - Department of Accounting & Information Assurance

Wenjie Zhu


University of Maryland - Department of Accounting & Information Assurance

September 23, 2014


Abstract:     
Prior research argues that sequential decisions lead to a slippery slope toward unethical or fraudulent behavior, with little evidence to support such claims. We conduct two experiments which demonstrate the existence of the slippery slope in a controlled setting, and investigate how it leads “good people” (low-Machiavellians) to do “bad things.” The first experiment manipulates whether the potential to overstate personal performance in order to earn excess monetary compensation increases or decreases across two experimental tasks. We find that smaller initial incentives to misreport followed by larger subsequent incentives to misreport lead to greater subsequent misreporting by low-Machiavellians. High-Machiavellians do not exhibit this slippery slope pattern of behavior. Our second experiment manipulates the length of time between tasks to examine whether the effects of misreporting incentives on slippery slope behavior diminish as opportunities to misreport are separated. We again observe slippery slope behavior among low-Ms at the short horizon, but not at the long horizon. Our study confirms the existence of a slippery slope toward unethical behavior, highlights individual differences along an important personality trait, and suggests that slippery slope behavior is likely to be magnified when individuals are presented with frequent opportunities to misreport.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: slippery slope, misconduct, fraud, moral reasoning, Machiavellianism, cognitive dissonance

JEL Classification: M00, K00, K20, M10, M14, M40, M41

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 16, 2011 ; Last revised: September 24, 2014

Suggested Citation

Brown, Tim and Rennekamp, Kristina M. and Seybert, Nicholas and Zhu, Wenjie, Who Stands at the Top and Bottom of the Slippery Slope? (September 23, 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1810833 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1810833

Contact Information

Tim Brown
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Accountancy ( email )
1206 South Sixth Street
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
Kristina M. Rennekamp
Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management ( email )
401P - Sage Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-0500 (Phone)

Nicholas Seybert (Contact Author)
University of Maryland - Department of Accounting & Information Assurance ( email )
Robert H. Smith School of Business
College Park, MD 20742-9157
United States
Wenjie Zhu
University of Maryland - Department of Accounting & Information Assurance ( email )
Robert H. Smith School of Business
College Park, MD 20742-9157
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,535
Downloads: 305
Download Rank: 58,235
References:  51
Citations:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds