Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1810835
 


 



Charting a Course in Clearing


Colleen Baker


University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign College of Business

April 14, 2011

Bulletin of the Notre Dame Center for the Study of Financial Regulation, Forthcoming
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 11-18

Abstract:     
Memorable tales of financial collapse, such as that of Lehman Brothers (Lehman), Bear Stearns, and American Financial Group (AIG), frequently drive narratives of financial market crises and future preventative regulatory solutions. Much U.S. financial regulation, such as the monumental and historic “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,” (Dodd-Frank) can be understood from this perspective. Aspects of such responses, however, are sometimes puzzling. An example is the reforms surrounding certain financial market utilities in Dodd-Frank’s Title VIII, “Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010” (Title VIII). Financial market utilities often play a vital role in a process known as “payment, clearing and settlement,” which occurs after a financial trade is made. Title VIII authorizes the Federal Reserve Board (Fed), in consultation with the Treasury Department, to extend “discount and borrowing privileges only in unusual or exigent circumstances” to financial market utilities designated by Dodd-Frank’s new Financial Stability Oversight Council as “systemically important” or of “systemic importance.” That is, to provide an emergency funding backstop to such financial utilities. The Fed’s new emergency authority is additional to and separate from its “13(3)” emergency powers reformed by Dodd-Frank.

What little attention has so far focused on Title VIII analyzes the Fed’s new authority in relation to over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, especially credit default swaps (CDS). The actual scope of financial contracts for which this new authority is relevant, however, is quite vast: it includes any financial transactions using designated financial utilities. Therefore, Title VIII’s financial utility reforms are relevant not only to OTC derivatives, but also potentially to repurchase agreements (repos), and any other “financial transactions” that use designated financial utilities now or in the future. On the one hand, these reforms purport to be a critical component in “solving” the AIG problem, but this conclusion is uncertain. On the other hand, these reforms lay the groundwork for alleviating the problem of Lehman and Bear Stearns, but fall short of achieving a potential solution. For these reasons, I suggest that Title VIII’s financial utility reforms both go too far in theory in addressing the “AIG problem,” but not far enough in practice in addressing the “Bear Stearns and Lehman problem.”

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Clearing, Financial Collapse, U.S. Financial Regulation, Title VIII, AIG, Bear Stearns, Lehman, Dodd-Frank, Central, Counterparty, Clearinghouse

JEL Classification: E50, G20, K2

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 18, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Baker, Colleen, Charting a Course in Clearing (April 14, 2011). Bulletin of the Notre Dame Center for the Study of Financial Regulation, Forthcoming; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 11-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1810835

Contact Information

Colleen M. Baker (Contact Author)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign College of Business ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 662
Downloads: 138
Download Rank: 124,982

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds