Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1816295
 
 

Footnotes (118)



 


 



The Myth of Efficient Breach: New Defenses of the Expectation Interest


Daniel Markovits


Yale Law School

Alan Schwartz


Yale Law School

April 20, 2011

Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming
Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 431

Abstract:     
We defend contract law’s preference to protect the expectation with a liability rule against prominent doctrinal and moral critics who argue that a promisee should have a right to specific performance or to a restitutionary remedy. These critics argue that liability rule protection limited to contractual expectations unjustifiably favors promisors, by allowing a promisor to capture the entire gain from unilaterally exiting a contract as long as she compensates her promisee for the profit he would have realized had he received the goods or services the contract described. The critics prefer to vindicate contractual expectations with a property rule or restitution.

We show that a promisee’s gross payoff under the typical contract is invariant to the remedy the law accords him. Current defenders and critics focus on gross payoffs. In this analytic universe, no remedy can be shown to be superior to any other remedy. We argue below that the promisee’s net payoff, for transaction cost reasons, is higher under a contract that protects his expectation with a liability rule. This claim supports the dual performance hypothesis, which holds that promisees typically give their promisors discretion either to trade the goods or services at issue or to make a transfer to the promisee in lieu of trade. A promisor who transfers rather than trades therefore does not breach; rather, she breaches only when she rejects both trade and transfer. On this view of the law, a promisee’s suit to recover his expectation is a specific performance action to enforce the contract’s transfer term. We further explain that this approach renders contract law coherent; it is consistent with the law’s immanent normativity; and it is consistent also with the morality of promising.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 75

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 23, 2011 ; Last revised: May 26, 2011

Suggested Citation

Markovits, Daniel and Schwartz, Alan, The Myth of Efficient Breach: New Defenses of the Expectation Interest (April 20, 2011). Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming; Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 431. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1816295

Contact Information

Daniel Markovits
Yale Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Alan Schwartz (Contact Author)
Yale Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-432-4030 (Phone)
203-432-8260 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,164
Downloads: 455
Download Rank: 34,547
Footnotes:  118
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds