Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1822470
 


 



Consent and its Cousins


William A. Edmundson


Georgia State University College of Law

2011

Ethics, Vol. 121, 2011
Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-08

Abstract:     
Consent theories of political obligation draw upon the unique powers consent exhibits in everyday dealings, but they are frustrated by the "problem of massive nonconsent." Expansions of what is counted as consent, such as tacit or hypothetical consent, have seemed untrue to the core concept of giving willing consent. David Estlund proposes a novel conception, "normative consent," to address the problem of massive nonconsent while being true to "the idiom of consent." This comment details consent’s virtues and shows that consent theories cannot claim enough of them to vindicate political obligation.

Keywords: political obligation, consent, normative consent, nonconsent, obligation

JEL Classification: K00

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: April 26, 2011 ; Last revised: May 2, 2011

Suggested Citation

Edmundson, William A., Consent and its Cousins (2011). Ethics, Vol. 121, 2011; Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1822470

Contact Information

William A. Edmundson (Contact Author)
Georgia State University College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 4037
Urban Life Building, Room 402 140 Decatur Street
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States
404-413-9167 (Phone)
404-413-9225 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.gsu.edu/wedmundson/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 554

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.625 seconds