Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1824685
 
 

Footnotes (153)



 


 



An Inquiry into the Perception of Materiality as an Element of Scienter under SEC Rule 10b-5


Allan Horwich


Northwestern University - School of Law; Schiff Hardin LLP

April 27, 2011

Business Lawyer, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2011
Northwestern Law & Economic Research Paper No. 11-11
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 11-44

Abstract:     
In any private action or enforcement proceeding based on SEC Rule 10b-5 the plaintiff, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, must prove that the defendant engaged in deception or manipulation with scienter, that is, an intent to deceive (which lower courts have held encompasses reckless conduct). Where the gravamen of the claim is deception, the deception must have been material. A fact, including forward-looking information, is material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable shareholder would consider the fact important in making his investment decision. This Article demonstrates that in an appropriate case an assessment of whether the defendant acted with scienter should consider whether the defendant appreciated the materiality of an omitted or misrepresented fact. As one example, an insider who traded in the securities of his employer while he was aware of nonpublic information should not be found to have acted with scienter, if, before trading, he made a good faith evaluation of that information, including (but not necessarily) consulting with counsel, and concluded that the information was not material, even though a trier of fact later found that the information was material when the trade occurred.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: 10b-5, materiality, scienter, recklessness

JEL Classification: K22, K29

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 27, 2011 ; Last revised: January 24, 2012

Suggested Citation

Horwich, Allan, An Inquiry into the Perception of Materiality as an Element of Scienter under SEC Rule 10b-5 (April 27, 2011). Business Lawyer, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2011; Northwestern Law & Economic Research Paper No. 11-11; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 11-44. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1824685

Contact Information

Allan Horwich (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Schiff Hardin LLP ( email )
6600 Sears Tower
Chicago, IL 60606-6473
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,432
Downloads: 197
Download Rank: 85,460
Footnotes:  153

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.343 seconds