Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1825437
 


 



In Praise of Moral Judgment: The Restatement (Third) of Torts and Flagrant 'Bad Guy' Trespassers


Richard L. Cupp Jr.


Pepperdine University School of Law

2011

Wake Forest Law Review Forum, Vol. 1, 2010
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011/13

Abstract:     
In this Article, Professor Cupp argues that the Restatement (Third) of Torts’s creativity in addressing duty toward intentional, morally culpable trespassers is both appropriate and helpful for at least two reasons. First, jurisdictions’ approaches to assessing potential liability for injuries to intentional and morally culpable trespassers are untidy and divided. Thus, seeking to articulate a clear dominant rule would be problematic. Second, this unique category of tort claims has a highly disproportionate impact on public acceptance of the civil justice system. How these cases are adjudicated influences much more than the limited number of cases involving tort lawsuits by intentional, morally culpable trespassers. Because of the public’s perception of this subject of tort claims as emblematic of perceived problems with the broader civil justice system, this is an area in which thoughtful leadership by the ALI is particularly important.

Professor Cupp then examines two torts cases involving injuries to trespassers that were heavily influential on the development of the Restatement (Third) of Torts's position on this issue. The first is the 1971 Iowa case of Katko v. Briney. The second is the mid-1980s California case of Bodine v. Enterprise High School, which prompted changes to the California Civil Code that effectively eliminated tort liability for land possessors when a criminal trespassers are injured on their property. He concludes by exploring the impact of the use of specific language, such as the word "flagrant," in the Restatement (Third) of Torts when describing criminal trespassers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: tort, Restatement, trespasser, landowner, injury, liability, claim, ALI, flagrant

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 28, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Cupp, Richard L., In Praise of Moral Judgment: The Restatement (Third) of Torts and Flagrant 'Bad Guy' Trespassers (2011). Wake Forest Law Review Forum, Vol. 1, 2010; Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011/13. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1825437

Contact Information

R.L. Cupp Jr. (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
(310) 506-4658 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 585
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 190,971

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds