|
||||
|
||||
Taylor’s Rule versus Taylor RulesAlex Nikolsko-RzhevskyyLehigh University - Department of Economics David H. PapellUniversity of Houston - Department of Economics September 15, 2012 Abstract: Does the Taylor rule prescribe negative interest rates for 2009-2011? This question is important because negative prescribed interest rates provide a justification for quantitative easing once actual policy rates hit the zero lower bound. We answer the question by analyzing Fed policy following the recessions of the early-to-mid 1970s, the early 1990s, and the early 2000s in the context of both Taylor’s original rule and latter variants of Taylor rules. While Taylor’s original rule, which can be justified by historical experience during and following the recessions, does not produce negative prescribed interest rates for 2009-2011, variants of Taylor rules with larger output gap coefficients, which do produce negative interest rates, cannot be justified by the same historical experience. We conclude that the Taylor rule does not provide a rationale for quantitative easing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 27 Keywords: Taylor rule, monetary rules, recession, quantitative easing JEL Classification: E47, E52, E58 working papers seriesDate posted: May 2, 2011 ; Last revised: September 24, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.484 seconds