A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing
38 Pages Posted: 4 May 2011
There are 2 versions of this paper
A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing
A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing
Date Written: May 3, 2011
Abstract
This paper proposes a test of racial bias in capital sentencing based upon patterns of judicial errors in lower courts. We model the behavior of the trial court as minimizing a weighted sum of the probability of sentencing an innocent and that of letting a guilty defendant free. We define racial bias as a situation where the relative weight on the two types of errors is a function of defendant and/or victim race. The key prediction of the model is that if the court is unbiased, ex post the error rate should be independent of the combination of defendant and victim race. We test this prediction using an original dataset that contains the the race of the defendant and of the victim(s) for all capital appeals that became final between 1973 and 1995. We find robust evidence of bias against minority defendants who killed white victims: in Direct Appeal and Habeas Corpus the probability of error in these cases is 3 and 9 percentage points higher, respectively, than for minority defendants who killed minority victims.
Keywords: death penalty, racial bias, law, economics
JEL Classification: K4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials
By Patrick J. Bayer, Randi Hjalmarsson, ...
-
The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials
By Shamena Anwar, Patrick J. Bayer, ...
-
Testing for the Role of Prejudice in Emergency Departments Using Bounceback Rates
By Shamena Anwar and Hanming Fang
-
Testing for the Role of Prejudice in Emergency Departments Using Bounceback Rates
By Shamena Anwar and Hanming Fang
-
By Jonah B. Gelbach and Shawn D. Bushway
-
Do Jurors Discriminate? Evidence from State Juror Selection Procedures
By Jean Lee