Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1830502
 
 

Footnotes (5)



 


 



A Response to Goodwin Liu


Robin L. West


Georgetown University Law Center

May 3, 2011

Yale Law Journal (The Pocket Part), Vol. 116, pp. 157-162, 2006
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 11-43

Abstract:     
Professor Liu's article convincingly shows that the Fourteenth Amendment can be read, and has been read in the past, to confer a positive right on all citizens to a high-quality public education and to place a correlative duty on the legislative branches of both state and federal government to provide for that education. Specifically, the United States Congress has an obligation under the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause, Liu argues, to ensure that the public education provided by states meets minimal standards so that citizens possess the competencies requisite to meaningful participation in civic life. Liu's argument is not simply that Congress may, within the grant of power of the Fourteenth Amendment, address educational inequality, if it sees fit to do so (thus withstanding federalism challenges). Rather, Liu's claim is that the states, and Congress, jointly must do so. The Constitution imposes a duty on government to educate, and confers a positive right to an education upon the citizenry. A decent education, Liu argues, is part of what it means to be a citizen under the United States Constitution.

I applaud the constitutional and the moral ambition of this piece. Liu's paper is a stellar example of what I hope will prove to be an emerging genre: an exploration of the possible meaning of constitutional phrases in our constitutional text and history, as viewed through the lens of legislative purposes and legislative ends. The article is a study of constitutional politics rather than constitutional law; it is a study of the effect of constitutionalism on legislative decision-making rather than the effect of constitutionalism on adjudicated constitutional law. I hope that this article proves fecund – that it inspires not only criticism but also like-minded efforts to improve other aspects of our public life through a capacious view of our representative branch's constitutional obligations. Liu's argument has two somewhat undeveloped implications that I believe are worth exploring, one jurisprudential and one practical.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Constitutional Interpretation, Public Education, Politics and Legal Theory

JEL Classification: K00, K10, I28

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2011  

Suggested Citation

West, Robin L., A Response to Goodwin Liu (May 3, 2011). Yale Law Journal (The Pocket Part), Vol. 116, pp. 157-162, 2006; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 11-43. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1830502

Contact Information

Robin L. West (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 674
Downloads: 38
Footnotes:  5

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds