Acquiescence, Objection and the Death of Customary International Law
David J. Bederman
Emory University School of Law
April 25, 2011
Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Vol. 21, No. 31, 2010
Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 11-156
This piece, which appeared in a colloquium commenting on Curtis Bradley & Mitu Gulati, Withdrawing from International Custom, 120 Yale L.J. 202 (2010), focuses on whether customary international law (CIL) norms can ever be supplanted. This essay examines the phenomenon of persistent objection in the formation of CIL rules, as well as the potential for such norms to enter desuetude or to be affirmatively altered. The essay offers a coherent theory for CIL formation and dissolution, consistent with the underlying dynamism and legitimacy of this source for international legal obligation. Parts of this essay appeared in the author's recent volume, CUSTOM AS A SOURCE OF LAW (Cambridge University Press 2010).
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: customary international law, persistent objection, desuetudeworking papers series
Date posted: May 8, 2011 ; Last revised: June 6, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds