Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1832774
 
 

Footnotes (285)



 


 



FCC Regulation Versus Antitrust: How Net Neutrality is Defining the Boundaries


Babette Boliek


Pepperdine University School of Law

February 15, 2011

Boston College Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 1627, 2011
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012/1

Abstract:     
This Article challenges the various jurisdictional theories that underpin the FCC’s net neutrality regulation. The assertion of jurisdiction by the FCC over any aspect of the Internet ecosystem has raised populist, congressional, and even judicial rhetoric to a crescendo and resulted in a recent vote to defund the FCC’s efforts. This Article places the current crisis squarely in context of the long-standing jurisdictional struggle between regulation and antitrust law. These two regimes are often at jurisdictional cross-purposes because, even though they both purport to maximize the social good, they do so by inapposite means. Indeed, there is a policy choice inherent in the very jurisdictional authority permitted each regime – a choice that the FCC’s jurisdictional bases for net neutrality may actually circumvent and obfuscate. Focusing on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trinko and the D.C. Circuit’s even more recent decision in Comcast, this Article examines the jurisdictional boundaries between these regulatory and antitrust camps. In analyzing the jurisdictional limits of each through the lens of the net neutrality debate, this Article reveals opportunities for congressional reforms beyond mere rhetoric. To identify problematic uses of regulatory authority, this Article: (i) creates an innovative grouping of possible bases for regulatory authority labeled “satellite jurisdiction,” and (ii) proposes a new framework to classify possible jurisdictional overreach in what the author brands as either procedural or substantive opportunism. Finally, this Article recommends a new standard by which both procedural and substantive jurisdictional opportunism may be tempered and antitrust authority maximized where most salutary and appropriate.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: FCC, Antitrust, Regulation, Net Neutrality, Network Neutrality, Jurisdiction, Trinko, Comcast

JEL Classification: D42, D43, K20, K21, K23, L13, L40, L50

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2011 ; Last revised: April 23, 2013

Suggested Citation

Boliek, Babette, FCC Regulation Versus Antitrust: How Net Neutrality is Defining the Boundaries (February 15, 2011). Boston College Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 1627, 2011; Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012/1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1832774

Contact Information

Babette Boliek (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,003
Downloads: 135
Download Rank: 123,740
Footnotes:  285

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.828 seconds