Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1832926
 


 



Scaling the Lexicon Fortress: The United States Supreme Court’s Use of Dictionaries in the Twenty-First Century


Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier


CUNY School of Law

Samuel Thumma


Perkins Coie

May 5, 2011

Marquette Law Review, Vol. 94, 2010

Abstract:     
This Article examines the Court’s use of dictionaries in the first decade of the twenty-first century, building on previous research by Professor Kirchmeier and Judge Thumma regarding the Supreme Court’s history of using dictionaries: Samuel A. Thumma & Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier, The Lexicon Has Become a Fortress: The United States Supreme Court’s Use of Dictionaries, 47 BUFF. L. REV. 227 (1999); Samuel A. Thumma & Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier, The Lexicon Remains a Fortress: An Update, 5 GREEN BAG 51 (2001).

During Supreme Court Terms 2000 - 2001 through 2009 - 2010 the Justices have referenced dictionary definitions to define nearly 300 words or phrases. Yet the Court has never expressly explained the proper role and use of the dictionary in American jurisprudence. The Article studies the frequency and the approach the Justices have taken to citing dictionaries in the new century, and it considers the Court’s lack of a reasoned process for selecting or using dictionaries.

Part I examines the frequency of dictionary use in the new century as compared to past use, comparing the different Justices with respect to their dictionary usage and the dictionaries most frequently cited by the Court. Part II addresses the stages of dictionary use, from the initial decision to use a dictionary to define a word to the selection of the dictionary and the choice of definitions. Part III examines some recent cases that illustrate the approaches taken in using dictionaries to define terms from various sources, including the United States Constitution, statutes, and prior cases. The Article includes three comprehensive appendices that compile information from the twenty-first century cases, listing: (1) the terms defined by the Court with references to the cases; (2) the Justices who have used a dictionary in opinions (along with their frequency of use and which dictionaries are used); and (3) the dictionaries used by the Court. These appendices, when combined with the authors’ previous articles examining the Supreme Court’s dictionary use through the twentieth century, provide a comprehensive compilation of the use of dictionaries since the Court began.

The Article concludes that, in the twenty-first century, the Court continues to use dictionaries at a high rate with little guidance for parties, lawyers or others regarding when to turn to dictionaries, which dictionaries to use, and how to use dictionaries. Although the authors are able to deduce several principles from the Court’s history, to date, the United States Supreme Court has issued no definitive decision squarely addressing the proper use of the dictionary. The ongoing usage of dictionaries by the United States Supreme Court and other courts continues to demonstrate the need for such guidance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 183

Keywords: Dictionary, Dictionaries, Supreme Court, Justices

JEL Classification: K10, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Kirchmeier, Jeffrey L. and Thumma, Samuel, Scaling the Lexicon Fortress: The United States Supreme Court’s Use of Dictionaries in the Twenty-First Century (May 5, 2011). Marquette Law Review, Vol. 94, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1832926

Contact Information

Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier (Contact Author)
CUNY School of Law ( email )
2 Court Square
Long Island City, NY 11101
United States
Samuel Thumma
Perkins Coie ( email )
2901 N. Central Avenue
Suite 2000
Phoenix, AZ 85012-2788
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 631
Downloads: 116
Download Rank: 140,434

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds