Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1836684
 


 



The Political Morality of the Eighth Amendment


Mary Sigler


Arizona State University - College of Law

May 9, 2011

Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Since the early twentieth century, the Supreme Court has interpreted the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment as a progressive mandate that draws its meaning from “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.” In applying this standard, the Court looks to such objective considerations as legislative enactments, patterns of jury decision making, and international opinion as measures of contemporary values. At the same time, the Court intermittently invokes its “own judgment” as an independent gauge of constitutionality. This article assesses the viability of the “evolving standards” doctrine, concluding that, as presently conceived, it has produced an incoherent Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. In particular, by relying on majoritarian factors as a test of constitutionality, the Court has misconceived the nature and significance of a constitutional right. For in its zeal to avoid the charge that the subjective policy preferences of individual justices drive its decision making, the Court has embraced a form of moral skepticism that is inconsistent with the history and character of the Constitution. Despite the Court’s missteps, the evolving standards formulation is worth preserving because it highlights a number of important liberal-democratic values. According to this alternative conception, the touchstone of Eighth Amendment analysis is neither political popularity nor personal morality but the political morality of our liberal democracy – the best account of how our political values should shape and constrain the institution of punishment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 23, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Sigler, Mary, The Political Morality of the Eighth Amendment (May 9, 2011). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1836684

Contact Information

Mary Sigler (Contact Author)
Arizona State University - College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 654
Downloads: 69
Download Rank: 197,583

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.203 seconds