From Wards Cove to Ricci: Struggling Against the 'Built-In Headwinds' of a Skeptical Court
University of Colorado Law School
May 10, 2011
Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 46, 2011
U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-07
When the Supreme Court in 1971 first recognized disparate impact as a legal theory under Title VII, the Court explained that the "absence of discriminatory intent does not redeem employment procedures or testing mechanisms that operate as ‘built-in headwinds’ for minority groups and are unrelated to measuring job capability." Forty years later, it is the built-in headwinds of a Supreme Court skeptical of - perhaps even hostile to - the goals of disparate impact theory that pose the greatest challenge to continued movement toward workplace equality. The essay examines the troubled trajectory that disparate impact law has taken in the Court's jurisprudence, considering how the Supreme Court, Congress, lower courts and employers all interact in the application and enforcement of the principles of equality underlying Title VII.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: discrimination, disparate impact, Supreme Court, Civil Rights Act
JEL Classification: K40, K41, J70, J71, J78Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 11, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.500 seconds