The Valuation Differences between Stock Option and Restricted Stock Grants for US Firms
James H. Irving
Wayne R. Landsman
University of North Carolina Kenan-Flagler Business School
Bradley P. Lindsey
North Carolina State University
April 1, 2011
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 38, Nos. 3/4, pp. 395-412, 2011
In this study, we document a significant shift over the past several years from stock option-based compensation to restricted stock-based compensation. Additionally, we evaluate whether stock option grants and restricted stock grants result in similar valuation consequences for firms. We estimate cross-sectional valuation equations that include the value of stock option and restricted stock grants summed over the current and past two years, residual income, and book value of equity, after controlling for endogeneity. Consistent with prior research, our findings indicate that the market on average values stock option grants positively. However, in contrast to stock option grants, restricted stock grants are valued negatively. This result is consistent with restricted stock grants lacking the positive incentive effects of stock options and being viewed as a liability or expense to the firm.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: stock compensation, stock options, restricted stock, valuationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 11, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds