Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1838348
 
 

References (55)



 


 



Corporate Identity as Foundation of the Criminal Liability of Legal Persons (1): Theoretical Principles


Pieter Du Toit


North-West University

Gerrit Pienaar


North-West University

April 19, 2011

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2011

Abstract:     
The different models for the criminal liability of juristic persons reveal a tension between individualist and realistic approaches. For individualists a corporation is the product of a union of individuals. This means that a juristic person can only be held criminally responsible if the conduct and fault of an individual involved in the entity are attributed to the juristic person. For realists a corporate entity has an existence independent of its individual members. The juristic person is blameworthy because its corporate identity or corporate ethos encouraged the criminal conduct. A study of organisational theory reveals that corporate crime may not necessarily be traced to the fault of specific individuals. Corporate criminality often is the result of complex decisions on different levels of the corporate hierarchy and furthermore is encouraged by the manner in which the organisation is structured. Prominent scholars such as the American philosopher Peter A French and the Australian Brent Fisse rejected an individualist approach and attempted to develop models of corporate fault based on the corporate identity idea. The failure of a corporation to take preventative or corrective measures in reaction to corporate criminal conduct is regarded as the basis for corporate fault by these authors. French calls this the "principle of responsive adjustment" whilst Fisse names it the concept of "reactive fault." A more sophisticated model (the "corporate ethos" model), which is also more reconcilable with the basic notions of criminal law, was developed by the American legal scholar Pamela Bucy.

A corporation will be held criminally responsible if its corporate ethos has encouraged the criminal conduct. The corporate ethos can be established with reference to numerous factors such as the corporate hierarchy, corporate goals, the existing monitoring and compliance systems and the question whether employees are rewarded or indemnified for inappropriate behavior.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Criminal liability; doctrine of identification; vicarious liability; juristic persons; organisational theory; corporate identity; corporate culture

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 18, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Du Toit, Pieter and Pienaar, Gerrit, Corporate Identity as Foundation of the Criminal Liability of Legal Persons (1): Theoretical Principles (April 19, 2011). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1838348

Contact Information

Pieter Du Toit (Contact Author)
North-West University ( email )
Private Bag X6001
Potchefstroom, Northwest 2520
South Africa
Gerrit Pienaar
North-West University ( email )
Private Bag X6001
Potchefstroom, Northwest 2520
South Africa
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 451
Downloads: 80
Download Rank: 182,338
References:  55

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds