Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1838597
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (357)



 


 



Three Concepts of Dignity in Constitutional Law


Neomi Rao


George Mason University School of Law

May 11, 2011

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 183-271, 2011
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 11-20

Abstract:     
The U.S. Supreme Court and constitutional courts around the world regularly use the term human dignity when deciding cases about freedom of speech, reproductive rights, racial equality, gay marriage, and bioethics. Judges and scholars treat dignity as an important legal value, but they usually do not explain what it means and often imply that it has one obvious core meaning. A close review of constitutional decisions, however, demonstrates that courts do not have a singular conception of dignity, but rather different conceptions based on how they balance individual rights with the demands of social policy and community values. Using the insights of political theory and philosophy, this Article identifies three concepts of dignity used by constitutional courts and demonstrates how these concepts are fundamentally different in ways that matter for constitutional law. In contentious cases, the concepts of dignity will often conflict. If constitutional courts continue to rely on human dignity, judges must choose between different understandings of dignity. This Article provides the groundwork for making these choices and defending a concept of dignity consistent with American constitutional traditions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 91

Keywords: abortion, affirmative action, autonomy, communitarian, comparative, declaration, Due Process, Dworkin, Eighth Amendment, Equal Protection, First, hate speech, headscarf, Isaiah Berlin, Lawrence v. Texas, liberty, negative, positive, privacy, recognition, rights, same-sex marriage, Sixth, universal

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 13, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Rao, Neomi, Three Concepts of Dignity in Constitutional Law (May 11, 2011). Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 183-271, 2011; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 11-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1838597

Contact Information

Neomi Rao (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,558
Downloads: 600
Download Rank: 24,097
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  357

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.625 seconds