Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1838731
 
 

Footnotes (110)



 


 



Victim Impact Statements and Ancillary Harm: The American Perspective


Paul G. Cassell


University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Edna Erez


University of Illinois at Chicago

May 11, 2011

Canadian Criminal Law Review, Vol. 15, p. 149, 2011

Abstract:     
A recent article by Julian Roberts and Marie Manikis argues that the concept of “ancillary harm” explains why victim impact statements are useful at sentencing. Drawing on a recent decision from the Quebec Court of Appeals, they contend that impact statements help a judge assess foreseeable harm caused to a victim’s family member and others – “ancillary harm” – for which the defendant is properly held accountable under conventional retributive principles.

In this response, we bring an American perspective to bear on these issues, finding much in the American crime victims’ literature and court decisions to support the Robert-Manikis thesis. For example, at the recent sentencing of Bernie Madoff, the sentencing judge referenced ancillary harm as an important factor. A number of cases have reached similar conclusions. While not using the phrase “ancillary harm” to justify their actions, the court decisions make clear that foreseeable harm to others is an important consideration at sentencing. The American cases also support a crime victim having a right to deliver a victim impact statement not only in writing, but also orally at the sentencing hearing itself. Crime victims, however, should not be cross-examined when delivering their statement. Instead, the court should insure the reliability of information contained in a victim impact statement in other ways, as a number of decisions recognize.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: Victim, Crime Victim, Impact Statements, Criminal Justice, Sentencing

JEL Classification: K14, K41, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 14, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Cassell, Paul G. and Erez, Edna, Victim Impact Statements and Ancillary Harm: The American Perspective (May 11, 2011). Canadian Criminal Law Review, Vol. 15, p. 149, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1838731

Contact Information

Paul G. Cassell (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States
801-585-5202 (Phone)
801-581-6897 (Fax)

Edna Erez
University of Illinois at Chicago ( email )
Chicago, IL 60612
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,412
Downloads: 186
Download Rank: 90,491
Footnotes:  110

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.906 seconds