Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1839623
 
 

Footnotes (215)



 


 



Comment: The Gideon Split: Preconviction Indigent Defense Reform Litigation in Hurrell-Harring and Duncan


William H.W. McKenna


University of California Davis, School of Law

November 1, 2011

UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 193, 2011

Abstract:     
Forty-nine years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, many states continue to fail to effect its guarantee. Recently, some indigent defendants have challenged states’ systemic neglect of indigent defense through pre-conviction class action suits seeking prospective relief, like Hurrell-Harring v. State, in New York, and Duncan v. State, in Michigan. This Comment argues that pre-conviction civil claims alleging systemic Sixth Amendment deprivations and seeking prospective relief are not properly treated as ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Rather, such claims present the justiciable question of whether the state has enabled Gideon’s guarantee at all. In essence, when states systemically neglect indigent defense, thereby preventing public defenders from fulfilling their ethical obligations in individual cases, those states categorically deprive indigent defendants of their Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and courts must intervene.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: Pre-Conviction, Indigent Defense, Public Defense, Legal Aid, Reform Litigation, Hurrell-Harring, Duncan, Gideon, Strickland, Cronic, Class Action, Prospective Relief

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 14, 2011 ; Last revised: February 3, 2012

Suggested Citation

McKenna, William H.W., Comment: The Gideon Split: Preconviction Indigent Defense Reform Litigation in Hurrell-Harring and Duncan (November 1, 2011). UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 193, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1839623

Contact Information

William H.W. McKenna (Contact Author)
University of California Davis, School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 386
Downloads: 47
Footnotes:  215

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds