|
||||
|
||||
Harmony and Dissonance in Extraterritorial RegulationHannah L. BuxbaumIndiana University School of Law-Bloomington George T. Conway IIIWachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz William S. DodgeUniversity of California Hastings College of the Law Austen ParrishSouthwestern Law School May 12, 2011 American Society of International Law 105th Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2011 Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 219 Abstract: This paper contains four comments that were delivered by a panel on extraterritorial regulation at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law. The panelists took as their jumping-off point the 2010 decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, in which the Supreme Court addressed for the first time the extraterritorial application of the Securities Exchange Act’s anti-fraud provision. Discarding forty years’ worth of precedent developed in the lower courts, the Court held that Section 10(b) applied only to transactions taking place within the United States. The panelists discuss the case and its implications for cross-border securities litigation; the Court’s interpretation of the presumption against extraterritoriality and its consequences for effects-based regulation; and the role of international comity in global economic regulation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20 Keywords: extraterritoriality, securities regulation, morrison, international comity, jurisdiction, effects, class action JEL Classification: K22, K33, K41 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 14, 2011 ; Last revised: January 5, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 1.078 seconds