Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1839808
 


 



The Evolution of Trade Secret Law and Why Courts Commit Error When They Do Not Follow the Uniform Trade Secrets Act


Sharon K. Sandeen


Hamline University School of Law

Summer 2010

Hamline Law Review, Vol. 33, p. 493, 2010

Abstract:     
In the spring of 2010, the Hamline Law Review hosted a symposium to mark the thirtieth anniversary of the adoption of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. This article was written for the symposium and provides an exhaustive and detailed account of the historical context and drafting history of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (the UTSA).

Among other stories that it tells, the article explains that the UTSA was prompted by the “Erie/Sears/Compco squeeze.” Because of the Supreme Court’s famous decision in Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins in 1938, it was understood by business interests and their attorneys that the common law development of unfair competition law would have to occur at the state level. However, when the Supreme Court rendered its decisions in the Sears/Compco cases in 1964, the development of unfair competition law at the state level came to a screeching halt. This led to various efforts to fill-the-gap, including a number of proposals for a federal unfair competition law that, in some iterations, included a prohibition on trade secret misappropriation.

As detailed in the article, another impetus behind the development of the UTSA was the business community’s dissatisfaction with the pace of development and features of the common law of trade secrecy. Importantly, concern was expressed about the risks that trade secret rights would be over-asserted in ways that would unduly quell competition. Thus, care was taken to define trade secrets and available injunctive relief in ways that limit the scope of trade secret protection. In this regard, the drafters of the UTSA were guided by the Supreme Court's decision in Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp. which counsels against broad trade secret protection.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Trade Secret, Unfair Competition, Sears, Compco, Kewanee, Federal Preemption, Uniform Trade Secrets Act, UTSA, Unfair Trade Practices, Intellectual Property, Uniform Law, Legal History, Erie, Restatement First of Torts

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 13, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Sandeen, Sharon K., The Evolution of Trade Secret Law and Why Courts Commit Error When They Do Not Follow the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Summer 2010). Hamline Law Review, Vol. 33, p. 493, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1839808

Contact Information

Sharon K. Sandeen (Contact Author)
Hamline University School of Law ( email )
1536 Hewitt Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55104-1237
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 335
Downloads: 87
Download Rank: 165,810

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds