A False Promise of Fair Trials: A Case Study of China's Malleable Criminal Procedure Law

Rongjie Lan

Zhejiang University

October 1, 2010

Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 27, p. 101, 2010

China revised its Criminal Procedure Law in 1996 adopting an adversarial-style trial model and granting remarkable procedural safeguards to the accused. Many have been tempted to conclude that this new law is capable of ensuring fair trials for criminal defendants and thus could improve China’s record of human rights protection.

This article will argue that, despite some progresses in formality, the new law has been poorly implemented and has failed to fulfill its promise of fair trials. This article will examine two high profile cases in detail to demonstrate how procedural safeguards prescribed by the new law are frequently manipulated by judges, either to pursue efficiency and convenience or to accommodate outside influences such as political concerns, public outrage, personal friendship, or even bribes. These manipulations have caused the essence of fair trials intended to be created by the 1996 law to be largely nonexistent in modern proceedings, while at the same time allowing interferers to freely produce wrongful verdicts and disproportionate sentences.

The reality is that many of these problems are caused by institutional flaws in China’s criminal justice system, particularly the absence of a responsible judiciary. However, instead of pinning hopes for reform on unrealistic constitutional changes, this article proposes a technical approach that focuses on restructuring the 1996 law to make criminal trials less vulnerable to manipulation and interference. This technical solution would help to ensure fair trials by relying on the procedure itself, rather than on unreliable judges.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: Fair Trial, China, Criminal Procedure, Wrongful Conviction

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 15, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Lan, Rongjie, A False Promise of Fair Trials: A Case Study of China's Malleable Criminal Procedure Law (October 1, 2010). Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 27, p. 101, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1841583

Contact Information

Rongjie Lan (Contact Author)
Zhejiang University ( email )
38 Zheda Road
Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 663
Downloads: 173
Download Rank: 117,784

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.484 seconds