Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1843496
 


 



Brief of Amicus Curiae, Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-cv-01049-MHW (2010)


Nancy B. Rapoport


University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

May 16, 2011

Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-CV01049-MHW, 2010

Abstract:     
This amicus brief supports a bankruptcy court's order imposing sanctions on an attorney who, among other things, failed to appear at the debtor's confirmation hearing and encouraged the debtor to pay his fees by credit card prior to filing her petition.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Milavetz, ethics, bankruptcy ethics, sanctions, bankruptcy court, district court, consumer bankruptcy, professional responsibility

JEL Classification: K1, K19, K39, K40, K41, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 17, 2011 ; Last revised: July 31, 2012

Suggested Citation

Rapoport, Nancy B., Brief of Amicus Curiae, Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-cv-01049-MHW (2010) (May 16, 2011). Warren v. Seidel, United States District Court for the District of Ohio, Case No. 2:10-CV01049-MHW, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1843496

Contact Information

Nancy B. Rapoport (Contact Author)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )
4505 S. Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154-1003
United States
713-202-1881 (Phone)
702-895-2482 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.unlv.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 134
Downloads: 8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.250 seconds