Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1844550
 


 



Social Science in Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes: A Reply to the ASA’s Missed Opportunity to Promote Sound Science in Court by Mitchell, Monahan, and Walker


Laura Beth Nielsen


American Bar Foundation; Northwestern University - Department of Sociology

Amy Myrick


Northwestern University - Department of Sociology; Northwestern University - School of Law; American Bar Foundation

Jill D. Weinberg


DePaul University; American Bar Foundation

May 17, 2011

American Bar Foundation Research Paper

Abstract:     
In a paper recently posted on SSRN entitled 'The ASA’s Missed Opportunity to Promote Sound Science in Court,' the authors criticize the Amicus Brief filed by the American Sociological Association (ASA) and the Law and Society Association (LSA) in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Betty Dukes, et al. a case that currently is before the Supreme Court of the United States. The authors of Missed Opportunity make a variety of claims about Professor Bielby’s research, the ASA’s treatment of it, and the position of the ASA regarding social science evidence in court. This essay focuses on two kinds of claims made by the authors of Missed Opportunity. The first claims we address are about the ASA’s characterization of and Professor Bielby’s use of sources. In particular, Missed Opportunity questions Professor Bielby’s methodological sources, how he represented the state of the field of workplace inequality, and whether court documents are a reliable source of data for expert analysis. The second, and perhaps more significant, claims made in Missed Opportunity are around the disciplinary standards for data analysis, replicability, and causal claims.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: social science, sociology, litigation, employment, social framework analysis, Wal-Mart, discrimination

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 18, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Nielsen, Laura Beth and Myrick, Amy and Weinberg, Jill D., Social Science in Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes: A Reply to the ASA’s Missed Opportunity to Promote Sound Science in Court by Mitchell, Monahan, and Walker (May 17, 2011). American Bar Foundation Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1844550 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1844550

Contact Information

Laura Beth Nielsen (Contact Author)
American Bar Foundation ( email )
750 N. Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-988-6574 (Phone)
312-988-6579 (Fax)
Northwestern University - Department of Sociology ( email )
1810 Chicago Ave
Evanston, IL 60208
United States
Amy Myrick
Northwestern University - Department of Sociology ( email )
1810 Chicago Ave
Evanston, IL 60208
United States
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
American Bar Foundation ( email )
750 N. Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Jill D. Weinberg
DePaul University ( email )
United States
American Bar Foundation ( email )
750 N. Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,403
Downloads: 238
Download Rank: 75,590

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.391 seconds