Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1844584
 


 



Should You Use a Textbook to Teach Legal Research?


Nancy P. Johnson


Georgia State University College of Law

2011

Law Library Journal, Vol. 103, Summer 2011
Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-14

Abstract:     
Legal research professors have struggled with the question of assigning and using a text in class. Since there are many excellent legal research texts available, instructors may feel their students need a safety net of a printed textbook. For professors who decide to use a textbook, this article includes reviews of selected current legal research texts. On the other hand, professors may believe that many students do not read their legal research texts and prefer teaching without a textbook. Instead, they may use a series of web sites, PowerPoint slides, tutorials, podcasts, and electronic texts. The article also discusses student reaction to a legal research class at Georgia State University College of Law that does not use a textbook.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: legal research, legal bibliography, legal education, bibliographic instruction, education, textbooks

JEL Classification: I20, I29, K00, K10, K19

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 18, 2011 ; Last revised: December 17, 2012

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Nancy P., Should You Use a Textbook to Teach Legal Research? (2011). Law Library Journal, Vol. 103, Summer 2011; Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1844584

Contact Information

Nancy P. Johnson (Contact Author)
Georgia State University College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,974
Downloads: 260
Download Rank: 69,505

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds