Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1846765
 
 

Footnotes (18)



 


 



More on the Gettier Problem and Legal Proof: Unsafe Nonknowledge Does Not Mean that Knowledge Must Be Safe


Michael S. Pardo


University of Alabama School of Law

May 19, 2011

Legal Theory, Vol. 17, 2011
U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1846765

Abstract:     
In a previous article, “The Gettier Problem and Legal Proof,” I argued that epistemic conditions that undermine knowledge in Gettier-type cases also potentially undermine legal verdicts. For this reason, I argued, there is a deeper connection between knowledge and legal proof than is typically presupposed or argued for in the scholarly legal literature. Thus, I concluded, legal proof includes something like a knowledge requirement – in the sense that legal verdicts aim not only at truth and sufficient evidential support but also, as with knowledge, an appropriate connection between their truth and justifying evidential support.

This conclusion is compatible with different ways of articulating further epistemological details, and the argument that supports it does not depend on any novel or particularly controversial conceptions of the epistemic concepts or analysis of the Gettier problem. In a thoughtful reply to my article, Mark McBride focuses on the epistemic concept of safety as it applies to legal proof. McBride argues that my analysis depends on an account of knowledge in which safety is a necessary condition, and he argues that this dependence challenges my central claim. In this response, I explain why neither McBride’s specific examples nor general analysis undermine my central claim. They do, however, further clarify and illuminate epistemological issues underlying my central claim in ways that are useful and instructive.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: Evidence, Epistemology, Safety, Knowledge, Gettier Problem, Proof

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 24, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Pardo, Michael S., More on the Gettier Problem and Legal Proof: Unsafe Nonknowledge Does Not Mean that Knowledge Must Be Safe (May 19, 2011). Legal Theory, Vol. 17, 2011; U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1846765. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1846765 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1846765

Contact Information

Michael S. Pardo (Contact Author)
University of Alabama School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 443
Downloads: 111
Download Rank: 144,449
Footnotes:  18
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.250 seconds