Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (98)



 


 



Protecting Speech From the Heart: How Citizens United Strikes Down Political Speech Restrictions on Churches and Charities


Paul D. Weitzel


Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

May 20, 2011

Texas Review of Law & Politics, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This paper argues that tax deductible charities have a constitutional right to speak about politics. 501(c)(3) organizations include all tax deductible charities, including religious groups. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission abrogated the ban on political speech by 501(c)(3) organizations by rejecting the reasoning in Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington. Regan found that 501(c)(3) organizations could be prohibited from speaking because they would still be able to speak through affiliate organizations. Citizens United rejected this argument when applied to for-profit corporations, and that reasoning applies equally to non-profit organizations. Citizens United also rejected the distinction between subsidies and punishments, which Regan relied on in its holding.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: 501(c)(3), Citizens United

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 25, 2011 ; Last revised: October 31, 2011

Suggested Citation

Weitzel, Paul D., Protecting Speech From the Heart: How Citizens United Strikes Down Political Speech Restrictions on Churches and Charities (May 20, 2011). Texas Review of Law & Politics, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1848267

Contact Information

Paul D. Weitzel (Contact Author)
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP ( email )
450 Lexington Ave.
New York, NY 10017
United States
650-752-2067 (Phone)
650-752-3667 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,182
Downloads: 240
Download Rank: 61,806
Footnotes:  98

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 1.312 seconds